Sources ftc amazon theinformation

The Federal Trade Commission: Guide to Sources (Research …

Amazon.de

The Federal Trade Commission: Guide to Sources (Research and Information Guides in Business, Industry and Economic Institutions) : Larabee, …

FTC Opens Probe of Amazon’s MGM Purchase, Signaling …

FTC Opens Probe of Amazon’s MGM Purchase, Signaling a Lengthy Inquiry — The Information

09.07.2021 — However, for the past two years the FTC has been conducting a wide-ranging investigation of Amazon’s business, seeking information on nearly …

Any hopes that Amazon had of completing its $8.5 billion purchase of movie and TV studio MGM anytime soon may have just gone out the window. The Federal Trade Commission on Friday opened an in-depth investigation into the deal, according to people familiar with the matter, setting the stage for …

U.S. antitrust agency preparing lawsuit against Amazon

Amazon’s M&A Blitz Presents Challenges for FTC — The Information

22.08.2022 — We’re learning how Amazon plans to deal with Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan’s anti–tech acquisition policy—by striking so many …

We’re learning how Amazon plans to deal with Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan’s anti–tech acquisition policy—by striking so many deals that the FTC will have a hard time fighting them all. You could call it the whack-a-mole M&A strategy. That’s one interpretation of Sunday’s news that …

FTC won’t challenge Amazon’s One Medical deal

U.S. antitrust agency preparing lawsuit against Amazon – WSJ | Reuters

03.02.2023 — The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is preparing a possible antitrust lawsuit against e-commerce giant Amazon.com Inc , the Wall Street …

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is preparing a possible antitrust lawsuit against e-commerce giant Amazon.com Inc , the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter.

FTC Staff Presents Report on Nearly a Decade of …

U.S. FTC asks Amazon, One Medical for more information on $3.49-bln deal | Reuters

02.09.2022 — One Medical said on Friday the U.S. Federal Trade Commission had sought more information from the company and Amazon.com Inc about the …

One Medical said on Friday the U.S. Federal Trade Commission had sought more information from the company and Amazon.com Inc about the primary care provider’s $3.49-billion acquisition by the online retailer.

EU Competition Law, Data Protection and Online Platforms: …

FTC won’t challenge Amazon’s One Medical deal – POLITICO

vor 10 Stunden — The Federal Trade Commission has decided it won’t challenge Amazon’s $3.9 billion deal for primary care provider One Medical, according to a …

The retail giant remains in the agency’s crosshairs.

When They Call – Seite 124 – Google Books-Ergebnisseite

FTC Staff Presents Report on Nearly a Decade of Unreported Acquisitions by the Biggest Technology Companies | Federal Trade Commission

15.09.2021 — Report analyzes acquisitions by Alphabet/Google, Amazon, Apple, … For the latest news and resources, follow the FTC on social media, …

At an open Commission meeting today, the Federal Trade Commission staff presented findings from its inquiry into past acquisitions by the largest technology platforms’ that did not require reportin

FTC to Examine Past Acquisitions by Large Technology Companies | Federal Trade Commission

11.02.2020 — The orders require Alphabet Inc. (including Google), Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Facebook, Inc., and Microsoft Corp. to provide information …

Note: The FTC will host a conference call for media with FTC Chairman Joe Simons:

EU Competition Law, Data Protection and Online Platforms: Data as Essential … – Inge Graef – Google Books

All are agreed that the digital economy contributes to a dynamic evolution of markets and competition. Nonetheless, concerns are increasingly raised about the market dominance of a few key players. Because these companies hold the power to drive rivals out of business, regulators have begun to seek scope for competition enforcement in cases where companies claim that withholding data is needed to satisfy customers and cut costs. This book is the first focus on how competition law enforcement tools can be applied to refusals of dominant firms to give access data on online platforms such as search engines, social networks, and e-commerce platforms – commonly referred to as the ‘gatekeepers’ of the Internet. The question arises whether the denial of a dominant firm to grant competitors access to its data could constitute a ‘refusal to deal’ and lead to competition law liability under the so-called ‘essential facilities doctrine', according to which firms need access to shared knowledge in order to be able to compete. A possible duty to share data with rivals also brings to the forefront the interaction of competition law with data protection legislation considering that the required information may include personal data of individuals. Building on the refusal to deal concept, and using a multidisciplinary approach, the analysis covers such issues and topics as the following: – data portability; – interoperability; – data as a competitive advantage or entry barrier in digital markets; – market definition and dominance with respect to data; – disruptive versus sustaining innovation; – role of intellectual property regimes; – economic trade-off in essential facilities cases; – relationship of competition enforcement with data protection law and – data-related competition concerns in merger cases. The author draws on a wealth of relevant material, including EU and US decision-making practice, case law, and policy documents, as well as economic and empirical literature on the link between competition and innovation. The book concludes with a proposed framework for the application of the essential facilities doctrine to potential forms of abuse of dominance relating to data. In addition, it makes suggestions as to how data protection interests can be integrated into competition policy. An invaluable contribution to ongoing academic and policy discussions about how data-related competition concerns should be addressed under competition law, the analysis clearly demonstrates how existing competition tools for market definition and assessment of dominance can be applied to online platforms. It will be of immeasurable value to the many jurists, business persons, and academics concerned with this very timely subject.

When They Call – Ken Hubbs – Google Books

A realist and no-nonsense professional, Ken Hubbs has dedicated his life to helping others through a myriad of life crises of almost every imaginable variety. Ken brings to bear his significant life experience, commitment to excellence, and undaunted integrity, along with a scholar's touch, to provide what may prove to be the most accessible and practical work to date for helping people deal with unfair debt collection practices. Includes the full text of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (1977).